Re: [PATCH 0/9] cpufreq: Add missing modalias for tristate drivers

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:35 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09-11-20, 15:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:14 PM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Some of cpufreq drivers are tristate, can be compiled as modules, but do
> > > not have defined modalias for automatic loading. This patch series add
> > > for all those cpufreq drivers missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE macro, based
> > > on OF definitions, or MODULE_ALIAS for platform drivers.
> > >
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is not explictily added only for speedstep-centrino,
> > > speedstep-ich and speedstep-smi drivers as it was removed in commit
> > > b11d77fa300d9 ("cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros").
> > >
> > > Pali Rohár (9):
> > >   cpufreq: ap806: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: highbank: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: mediatek: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: qcom: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: st: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: sun50i: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> > >   cpufreq: loongson1: Add missing MODULE_ALIAS
> > >   cpufreq: scpi: Add missing MODULE_ALIAS
> > >   cpufreq: vexpress-spc: Add missing MODULE_ALIAS
> > >
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c    | 6 ++++++
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c     | 7 +++++++
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/loongson1-cpufreq.c    | 1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c     | 1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c   | 1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c         | 1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c          | 7 +++++++
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/sun50i-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 1 +
> > >  9 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Viresh, any comments?
>
> I found the patches to be fine and marked it to be applied soon in mutt. I was
> waiting for the maintainers of the drivers to respond, after that I would have
> applied it for 5.11.

OK, so please take all of them then (some of them are not ARM-related AFAICS).