Re: [PATCH v4 net] net: udp: fix Fast/frag0 UDP GRO

From: Willem de Bruijn
Date: Wed Nov 11 2020 - 12:29:04 EST


On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:29:06 +0000 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > >>> + sk = static_branch_unlikely(&udp_encap_needed_key) ?
> > >>> + udp4_gro_lookup_skb(skb, uh->source, uh->dest) :
> > >>> + NULL;
> > >
> > > Does this indentation pass checkpatch?
> >
> > Sure, I always check my changes with checkpatch --strict.
> >
> > > Else, the line limit is no longer strict,a and this only shortens the
> > > line, so a single line is fine.
> >
> > These single lines is about 120 chars, don't find them eye-pleasant.
> > But, as with "u32" above, they're pure cosmetics and can be changed.
>
> let me chime in on the perhaps least important aspect of the patch :)
>
> Is there are reason to use a ternary operator here at all?
> Isn't this cleaner when written with an if statement?
>
> sk = NULL;
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&udp_encap_needed_key))
> sk = udp4_gro_lookup_skb(skb, uh->source, uh->dest);

Ah indeed :)

One other thing I missed before. The socket lookup is actually an
independent issue, introduced on commit a6024562ffd7 ("udp: Add GRO
functions to UDP socket"). Should be a separate Fixes tag, perhaps
even a separate patch.