Re: [PATCH 06/25] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Remove set but unchecked variable 'ret'

[santosh . shilimkar]

On 11/12/20 11:02 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > On 11/12/20 5:21 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12/11/2020 12:31, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > Cc:ing a few people I know.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 03 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function ‘knav_setup_queue_pools’:
> > > > > >     drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1310:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Sandeep Nair <sandeep_n@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >     drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 3 +--
> > > > > >     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Any idea who will take these TI patches?
> > > > >
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201111052540.GH173948@xxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KEeMCT-GwmLNnDFCOqxnunXXiCrCpj3ZFXpiMzj55VmlOJ-FVhKmom-O7sq-CkL8s0sjAg$
> > > >
> > > > (Dropped a few inactive emails from delivery.)
> > > >
> > > > Santosh is the maintainer for the subsystem, so my vote would go for him.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your prompt reply Tero.
> > >
> > > It looks as though Santosh has been on Cc since the start.  He must
> > > just be busy.  I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a
> > > [RESEND].
> > Go ahead and re-post. These seems to be trivial so will pick
> > it up.
>
> If you are in receipt of the first iteration, there shouldn't be any
> requirement for a [RESEND].  Unless you deleted them from your inbox?
I haven't deleted anything. I thought you are going to repost based
on "I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a [RESEND]"
:-)

Regards,
Santosh


Regards,
Santosh