On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:12 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/6/2020 11:00 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:51:02AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
- Update Skylake events to v50.
- Update Skylake JSON metrics from TMAM 4.0.
- Fix the issue in DRAM_Parallel_Reads
- Fix the perf test warning
Before:
root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -M DRAM_Parallel_Reads -- sleep 1
event syntax error: '{arb/event=0x80,umask=0x2/,arb/event=0x80,umask=0x2,thresh=1/}:W'
\___ unknown term 'thresh' for pmu 'uncore_arb'
valid terms: event,edge,inv,umask,cmask,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore
Initial error:
event syntax error: '..umask=0x2/,arb/event=0x80,umask=0x2,thresh=1/}:W'
\___ Cannot find PMU `arb'. Missing kernel support?
root@kbl-ppc:~# perf test metrics
10: PMU events :
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Skip (some metrics failed)
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs: Ok
67: Parse and process metrics : Ok
After:
root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat -M MEM_Parallel_Reads -- sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
4,951,646 arb/event=0x80,umask=0x2/ # 26.30 MEM_Parallel_Reads (50.04%)
188,251 arb/event=0x80,umask=0x2,cmask=1/ (49.96%)
1.000867010 seconds time elapsed
root@kbl-ppc:~# perf test metrics
10: PMU events :
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics : Ok
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs: Ok
67: Parse and process metrics : Ok
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It seems not applied to acme/perf/core cleanly.
Thanks,
Namhyung
It seems the patch mail is truncated. :(
I attach the patch file in the mail. Sorry for inconvenience.
I've checked it fixed the perf test on my laptop (skylake).
Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Namhyung