Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: stmfx: fix dev_err_probe call in stmfx_chip_init
From: Lee Jones
Date: Fri Nov 13 2020 - 05:09:53 EST
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> ret may be 0 so, dev_err_probe should be called only when ret is an error
> code.
>
> Fixes: 41c9c06c491a ("mfd: stmfx: Simplify with dev_err_probe()")
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> index 5e680bfdf5c9..360fb4646688 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> @@ -329,12 +329,11 @@ static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
> ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmfx->vdd);
> - if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> - } else {
> + else if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> "Failed to get VDD regulator\n");
> - }
Probably nicer to keep all of the error handing in one area, like:
if (ret) {
if (ret == -ENODEV)
stmfx->vdd = NULL;
else
return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
"Failed to get VDD regulator\n");
}
I'll let you make the call though.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog