On 2020/11/12 22:03, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 11/12/20 1:09 PM, Qi Liu wrote:
On 2020/11/12 1:03, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:58:23PM +0800, Qi Liu wrote:Hi Mathieu,
Hi Mathieu,
On 2020/9/10 0:26, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Mike Leach wrote:Considering that users sometimes use the same set of code on different platforms, how about
Hi,That's a good idea - they do the same for CPU erratas.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 11:36, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/27/2020 09:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:In addition to the above, Is it worth having this implementation
Hi Liu,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:06:37PM +0800, Qi Liu wrote:
When too much trace information is generated on-chip, the ETM will
overflow, and cause data loss. This is a common phenomenon on ETM
devices.
But sometimes we do not want to lose performance trace data, so we
suppress the speed of instructions sent from CPU core to ETM to
avoid the overflow of ETM.
Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- ETM on HiSilicon Hip09 platform supports backpressure, so does
not need to modify core commit.
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
index 7797a57..7641f89 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(boot_enable, "Enable tracing on boot");
#define PARAM_PM_SAVE_NEVER 1 /* never save any state */
#define PARAM_PM_SAVE_SELF_HOSTED 2 /* save self-hosted state only */
+#define CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR 0x3000
+#define CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT 12
+#define HISI_ETM_AMBA_ID_V1 0x000b6d01
+
static int pm_save_enable = PARAM_PM_SAVE_FIRMWARE;
module_param(pm_save_enable, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(pm_save_enable,
@@ -104,11 +108,40 @@ struct etm4_enable_arg {
int rc;
};
+static void etm4_cpu_actlr1_cfg(void *info)
+{
+ struct etm4_enable_arg *arg = (struct etm4_enable_arg *)info;
+ u64 val;
+
+ asm volatile("mrs %0,s3_1_c15_c2_5" : "=r"(val));
The ID register (S3_1_C15_c2_5) falls into implementation defined space.
See Arm ARM DDI 0487F.a, section "D12.3.2 Reserved encodings for
IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED registers".
So, please stop calling this "etm4_cpu_actlr1_cfg". Since,
1) actlr1 is not an architected name for the said encoding
2) The id register could mean something else on another CPU.
Rather this should indicate platform/CPU specific. e.g,
etm4_cpu_hisilicon_config_core_commit()
Please could you move this check to the function above ?+ val &= ~CORE_COMMIT_CLEAR;Function etm4_enable/disable_hw() are already running on the CPU they are
+ val |= arg->rc << CORE_COMMIT_SHIFT;
+ asm volatile("msr s3_1_c15_c2_5,%0" : : "r"(val));
+}
+
+static void etm4_config_core_commit(int cpu, int val)
+{
+ struct etm4_enable_arg arg = {0};
+
+ arg.rc = val;
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, etm4_cpu_actlr1_cfg, &arg, 1);
supposed to so no need to call smp_call_function_single().
+}
+
static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
{
int i, rc;
+ struct amba_device *adev;
struct etmv4_config *config = &drvdata->config;
struct device *etm_dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev;
+ struct device *dev = drvdata->csdev->dev.parent;
+
+ adev = container_of(dev, struct amba_device, dev);
+ /*
+ * If ETM device is HiSilicon ETM device, reduce the
+ * core-commit to avoid ETM overflow.
+ */
+ if (adev->periphid == HISI_ETM_AMBA_ID_V1)
Ideally, it would be good to have something like :
etm4_config_impdef_features();
And :
etm4_config_impdef_features(struct etm4_drvdata *drvdata)
{
etm4_cpu_hisilicon_config_core_commit(drvdata);
}
defined code gated in the kernel configuration - like we do for core
features sometimes?
i,.e.
CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE (controls overall impdef support in the driver)
and
CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_HISILICON (depends on CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE )
This way we keep non ETM architectural code off platforms that cannot
use it / test it.
using both CONFIG andperiphid to keep core-commit code off the platforms that do not
need it?
i, .e.
CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE ( controls overall impdef support in the driver )
periphid ( match impdef code with the target platform )
This way we could keep the same set of code working on different platforms, and it could help to
ensure compatibility.
I'm not 100% sure of what you mean by "same set of code working on different
platforms"... Up to know the way we have been handling peripheral IDs has
worked quite well and I don't intend on changing it unless there is a really
good reason.
Perhaps I didn't make it clear and here is the code to express what I mean:
#ifdef CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE
#define HISI_HIP08_AMBA_ID 0x000b6d01
#define HISI_HIP08_AMBA_MASK 0xfffff
static void etm4_enable_arch_specific(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
{
struct device *dev = drvdata->csdev->dev.parent;
struct amba_device *adev = container_of(dev, struct amba_device, dev);
There is no guarantee that this is always an "AMBA" device, with this
patchset (which is still under review). Also, doing this check at
every time we enable/disable the ETM is not idea..
May be we should add a concept of "features" and use a bit mask instead,
which can be set at probe time, where we do have this information.
#define ETM4x_IMPDEF_HISILICON_CORE_COMMIT 0
#define ETM4x_IMPDEF_ARCH_N_FEATS 1
struct etmv4_drvdata {
...
DECALRE_BITMAP(arch_features, ETM4x_IMPDEF_ARCH_FEAT_MAX);
}
struct etm4x_arch_feature {
void (*callback)(struct etmv4_drdvata *, bool enable);
};
static struct etm4x_arch_features[] = {
[ETM4x_IMPDEF_HISILICON_CORE_COMMIT] = {
.callback = etm4x_hisilicon_core_commit,
},
{}
};
static void etm4_enable_arch_specific(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
{
for_each_set_bit(i, &drvdata->arch_features) {
struct etm4x_arch_feature *ftr = &etm4x_arch_features[i];
if (ftr->callback)
ftr->callback(drvdata, true);
}
}
etm4x_check_arch_features() {
if (hisilicon_etm4x_match_pid)
set_bit(drvdata->arch_features, ETM4x_IMPDEF_HISILICON_CORE_COMMIT);
}
etm4x_probe() {
etm4x_check_arch_features();
}
Suzuki
Hi Suzuki,
Add a check in probe is a good idea, and perhaps we could also add CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE
here, like:
etm4x_probe() {
...
#ifdef CONFIG_ETM4X_IMPDEF_FEATURE
etm4x_check_arch_features();
#endif
}
Thanks
Qi
.