Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Expose bpf_d_path helper to sleepable LSM hooks

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 11/13/20 4:18 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> On 11/12/20 9:19 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Sleepable hooks are never called from an NMI/interrupt context, so it is
> > safe to use the bpf_d_path helper in LSM programs attaching to these
> > hooks.
> >
> > The helper is not restricted to sleepable programs and merely uses the
> > list of sleeable hooks as the initial subset of LSM hooks where it can
>
> sleeable => sleepable
>
> probably not need to resend if no other major changes. The maintainer
> can just fix it up before merging.

Did while rebasing & applying, thanks everyone!

> > be used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>