Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] seqnum_ops: Introduce Sequence Number Ops

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:03:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> I think almost all of this information should go into atomic_ops.rst

No, we should delete atomic_ops.rst. It's bitrotted nonsense. The only
reason it still exists is because I can't seem to get around to
verifying we've actually covered everything in the new documentation:

	Documentation/atomic_*.txt