Re: [PATCH v6 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting

From: Roman Gushchin
Date: Mon Nov 16 2020 - 22:43:24 EST

Next message: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v6 07/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps"
Previous message: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v6 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH v6 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 06:54:55PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Currently bpf is using the memlock rlimit for the memory accounting.
> This approach has its downsides and over time has created a significant
> amount of problems:
>

I'm sorry, I've missed the "bpf-next" prefix in the subject.
Resending.

Thanks!

Next message: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v6 07/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps"
Previous message: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v6 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH v6 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]