Re: + mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode.patch added to -mm tree
From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Tue Nov 17 2020 - 01:17:39 EST
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> The patch titled
> Subject: mm/shmem: use kmem_cache_zalloc in shmem_alloc_inode()
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode.patch
>
> This patch should soon appear at
> https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode.patch
> and later at
> https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode.patch
>
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
> a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
> b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
> c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
> reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
>
> *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
>
> The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
> there every 3-4 working days
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: mm/shmem: use kmem_cache_zalloc in shmem_alloc_inode()
Andrew, Stephen, please revert this untested "cleanup" from your
trees a.s.a.p: it's a disaster for anyone using shmem/tmpfs.
>
> in shmem_get_inode():
> new_inode();
> new_inode_pseudo();
> alloc_inode();
> ops->alloc_inode(); -> shmem_alloc_inode()
> kmem_cache_alloc();
>
> memset(info, 0, (char *)inode - (char *)info);
>
> So use kmem_cache_zalloc() in shmem_alloc_inode(),
> and remove the memset in shmem_get_inode().
I could not follow that argument at all. The shmem_inode_cachep
uses a constructor, and the memset shown is of only a portion of
the whole inode. zeroing the entire inode quickly crashes the
kernel, after showing errors.
(If you're lucky enough to have a readable display at that point:
I did not, but got on better with framebuffer than drm/i915; and
I wonder if there's a separate bug in that area too, because fixing
this shmem issue is not enough to get my drm/i915 rc4-mm1 booting.)
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201115174026.GA365412@rlk
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@xxxxxxx>
NAK. Hui Su, please test your "cleanups" before sending them.
I'm sorry for being slow to respond, but the priority appeared
to be to get Matthew Wilcox's series running reliably, so I had not
got around to checking the less urgent shmem patches before they
slipped into mmotm - there may well be more that I want to NAK,
but this is the dangerous one.
Thanks,
Hugh
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> mm/shmem.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/shmem.c~mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode
> +++ a/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2331,7 +2331,6 @@ static struct inode *shmem_get_inode(str
> inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
> inode->i_generation = prandom_u32();
> info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> - memset(info, 0, (char *)inode - (char *)info);
> spin_lock_init(&info->lock);
> atomic_set(&info->stop_eviction, 0);
> info->seals = F_SEAL_SEAL;
> @@ -3851,7 +3850,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *shmem_inode_ca
> static struct inode *shmem_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct shmem_inode_info *info;
> - info = kmem_cache_alloc(shmem_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> + info = kmem_cache_zalloc(shmem_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!info)
> return NULL;
> return &info->vfs_inode;
> _
>
> Patches currently in -mm which might be from sh_def@xxxxxxx are
>
> mmslab_common-use-list_for_each_entry-in-dump_unreclaimable_slab.patch
> mm-shmem-use-kmem_cache_zalloc-in-shmem_alloc_inode.patch
> mm-page_counter-use-page_counter_read-in-page_counter_set_max.patch
> mm-hugetlbc-just-use-put_page_testzero-instead-of-page_count.patch
> mm-compaction-move-compaction_suitables-comment-to-right-place.patch
> mm-oom_kill-change-comment-and-rename-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs.patch
> acctc-use-elif-instead-of-end-and-elif.patch
> mm-memcontrol-rewrite-mem_cgroup_page_lruvec.patch