Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself

From: Bilal Wasim
Date: Tue Nov 17 2020 - 06:59:20 EST

Next message: Jacopo Mondi: "Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] media: atmel: introduce microchip csi2dc driver"
Previous message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [RFC PATCH] acpi/irq: Add stacked IRQ domain support to PCI interrupt link"
In reply to: Chun-Kuang Hu: "Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself"
Next in thread: Bilal Wasim: "Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi CK,

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:43:44 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, Bilal:
>
> Bilal Wasim <bilalwasim676@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年11月16日週一
> 下午7:53寫道：
> >
> > Hi CK,
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 07:12:55 +0800
> > Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Bilal:
> > >
> > > Bilal Wasim <bilalwasim676@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年11月16日週一
> > > 上午3:25寫道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi CK,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:53:24 +0800
> > > > Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Bilal:
> > > > >
> > > > > Please help to test this patch on your Chromebook elm, thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu
> > > >
> > > > Just tried this patch on the Chromebook Elm, and it doesn't
> > > > work. The HDMI screen remains black, though the rest of the
> > > > system keeps on operating normally.
> > >
> > > Could you print this information, so I could find out the
> > > solution for both small hbp and elm.
> > >
> > > vm->hfront_porch, vm->hback_porch, dsi_tmp_buf_bpp,
> > > data_phy_cycles_byte, and the final horizontal_frontporch_byte,
> > > horizontal_backporch_byte.
> >
> > Here are the values I got,
> >
> > [ 2.506400] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
> > [ 2.506402] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
> > [ 2.506404] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
> > [ 2.506406] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 180
> > [ 2.506408] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 110
> > [ 2.506409] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 455
> >
> > Please let me know if I can help debug this in any other way.
> >
>
> How about this patch [1] ?
>
> [1]
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2536217/2

This patch works, though it doesn't apply cleanly on 5.9-rc3 (had to
manually patch the mtk_dsi.c file).

Here are the various variable values, if you're interested.

[ 2.453292] [drm] vm->hfront_porch: 48
[ 2.453293] [drm] vm->hback_porch: 200
[ 2.453295] [drm] dsi_tmp_buf_bpp: 3
[ 2.453296] [drm] data_phy_cycles_byte: 192
[ 2.453298] [drm] horizontal_frontporch_byte: 107
[ 2.453299] [drm] horizontal_backporch_byte: 436

Thanks,
Bilal

>
> > Thanks,
> > Bilal
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Chun-Kuang.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年11月15日週日
> > > > > 上午8:14寫道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > > > > > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of
> > > > > > panel with small hfp or hbp")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53
> > > > > > ++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 18
> > > > > > insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index
> > > > > > 4a188a942c38..2a64fdaed9a7 100644 ---
> > > > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++
> > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@
> > > > > > static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte; u32
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte; u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > > > > > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > > > > > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > > > > > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > > > > > + u32 delta;
> > > > > > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> > > > > > @@ -474,42 +477,22 @@ static void
> > > > > > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare
> > > > > > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > > > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch); -
> > > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > > > > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > > > - } else {
> > > > > > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS
> > > > > > will under 60Hz\n");
> > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > > > - }
> > > > > > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
> > > > > > ? 18 : 12; +
> > > > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > > > + horizontal_front_back_byte =
> > > > > > horizontal_frontporch_byte
> > > > > > + horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > > > > > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes
> > > > > > + delta; +
> > > > > > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte >
> > > > > > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > > > > > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -=
> > > > > > data_phy_cycles_byte * +
> > > > > > horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> > > > > > + horizontal_backporch_byte -=
> > > > > > data_phy_cycles_byte * +
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte /
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> > > > > > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > > > > > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 12) *
> > > > > > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > > > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > > > > > horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > > > > > - (data_phy_cycles *
> > > > > > dsi->lanes + 12) *
> > > > > > - vm->hback_porch /
> > > > > > - (vm->hfront_porch +
> > > > > > vm->hback_porch);
> > > > > > - } else {
> > > > > > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS
> > > > > > will under 60Hz\n");
> > > > > > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > > > > > vm->hfront_porch *
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > > > > > - }
> > > > > > + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS
> > > > > > will under 60Hz\n"); }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs +
> > > > > > DSI_HSA_WC); --
> > > > > > 2.17.1
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Bilal
> >

Next message: Jacopo Mondi: "Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] media: atmel: introduce microchip csi2dc driver"
Previous message: Ard Biesheuvel: "Re: [RFC PATCH] acpi/irq: Add stacked IRQ domain support to PCI interrupt link"
In reply to: Chun-Kuang Hu: "Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself"
Next in thread: Bilal Wasim: "Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Calculate horizontal_backporch_byte by itself"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]