[PATCH 5.4 120/151] futex: Dont enable IRQs unconditionally in put_pi_state()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 1e106aa3509b86738769775969822ffc1ec21bf4 upstream.

The exit_pi_state_list() function calls put_pi_state() with IRQs disabled
and is not expecting that IRQs will be enabled inside the function.

Use the _irqsave() variant so that IRQs are restored to the original state
instead of being enabled unconditionally.

Fixes: 153fbd1226fb ("futex: Fix more put_pi_state() vs. exit_pi_state_list() races")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106085205.GA1159983@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/futex.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -880,8 +880,9 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi
 	 */
 	if (pi_state->owner) {
 		struct task_struct *owner;
+		unsigned long flags;
 
-		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags);
 		owner = pi_state->owner;
 		if (owner) {
 			raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock);
@@ -889,7 +890,7 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi
 			raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock);
 		}
 		rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, owner);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock, flags);
 	}
 
 	if (current->pi_state_cache) {