Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memblock: drop __init from memblock functions to make it inline

[Mike Rapoport]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 05:05:37PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
> __init is used with inline due to which memblock wraper functions are
> not getting inline.
> for example:
> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 1490 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000000000000 memblock_alloc+0x20/0x2c
> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023f09a3c0-0x000000023f09a991] memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
> 
> Dropping __init from memblock wrapper functions to make it inline and it
> increase the debugability.
> After:
> [    0.000000] memblock_alloc_try_nid: 1490 bytes align=0x40 nid=-1 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000000000000 start_kernel+0xa4/0x568
> [    0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023f09a3c0-0x000000023f09a991] memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
> 
> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks!

I've updated memblock_alloc() to be __always_inline because some
configurations make kbuild happy without it.

>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0xbde): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_alloc() to the function .init.text:memblock_alloc_try_nid()
The function memblock_alloc() references
the function __init memblock_alloc_try_nid().
This is often because memblock_alloc lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of memblock_alloc_try_nid is wrong.

> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index ef13125..f78113f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -404,13 +404,13 @@ void *memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
>  			     phys_addr_t min_addr, phys_addr_t max_addr,
>  			     int nid);
>  
> -static inline void * __init memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size,  phys_addr_t align)
> +static inline void *memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size,  phys_addr_t align)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
>  				      MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_raw(phys_addr_t size,
> +static inline void *memblock_alloc_raw(phys_addr_t size,
>  					       phys_addr_t align)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(size, align, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_raw(phys_addr_t size,
>  					  NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_from(phys_addr_t size,
> +static inline void *memblock_alloc_from(phys_addr_t size,
>  						phys_addr_t align,
>  						phys_addr_t min_addr)
>  {
> @@ -426,33 +426,33 @@ static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_from(phys_addr_t size,
>  				      MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_low(phys_addr_t size,
> +static inline void *memblock_alloc_low(phys_addr_t size,
>  					       phys_addr_t align)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
>  				      ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void * __init memblock_alloc_node(phys_addr_t size,
> +static inline void *memblock_alloc_node(phys_addr_t size,
>  						phys_addr_t align, int nid)
>  {
>  	return memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT,
>  				      MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __init memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base,
> +static inline void memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base,
>  					      phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	memblock_free(base, size);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __init memblock_free_early_nid(phys_addr_t base,
> +static inline void memblock_free_early_nid(phys_addr_t base,
>  						  phys_addr_t size, int nid)
>  {
>  	memblock_free(base, size);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void __init memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> +static inline void memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  {
>  	__memblock_free_late(base, size);
>  }
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static inline void __init memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>  /*
>   * Set the allocation direction to bottom-up or top-down.
>   */
> -static inline void __init memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
> +static inline void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable)
>  {
>  	memblock.bottom_up = enable;
>  }
> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
> member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.