Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation

[Kees Cook]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 05:51:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Kees, I added you because you tend to know about these things.
>   Is it OK to assign a void func(void) that doesn't do anything and returns
>   nothing to a function pointer that could be call with parameters? We need
>   to add stubs for tracepoints when we fail to allocate a new array on
>   removal of a callback, but the callbacks do have arguments, but the stub
>   called does not have arguments.
> 
>   Matt, Does this patch fix the error your patch was trying to fix?
> ]

As I think got discussed in the thread, what you had here wouldn't work
in a CFI build if the function prototype of the call site and the
function don't match. (Though I can't tell if .func() is ever called?)

i.e. .func's prototype must match tp_stub_func()'s.

-- 
Kees Cook