Re: [PATCH 5.9 000/255] 5.9.9-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 19:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.9 release.
> There are 255 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:20:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

NOTE:
1)
BUG: Invalid wait context on arm64 db410c device while booting.
This issue has not reproduced after several testing loops.
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsk54r9Re4E9BWpqsoxLjpCvxRKFWRgdiKVcPoYE5z0Hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

2)
kselftest test suite version upgrade to v5.9

3)
While running kselftest netfilter on x86, i386, arm64 and arm devices
the following kernel warning was noticed.
WARNING: at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622
lockdep_nfnl_nft_mutex_not_held+0x19/0x20 [nf_tables]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+G9fYvFUpODs+NkSYcnwKnXm62tmP=ksLeBPmB+KFrB2rvCtQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

4)
>From this release we have started building kernels with clang-10 toolchain
and testing LTP testsuite on qemu_arm64, qemu_arm, qemu_x86_64 and qemu_i386.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.9.9-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.9.y
git commit: fb1622495321923cbb1ae2c6cf2da1e9ca286800
git describe: v5.9.8-256-gfb1622495321
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.9.y/build/v5.9.8-256-gfb1622495321

No regressions (compared to build v5.9.8)

No fixes (compared to build v5.9.8)

Ran 52946 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- nxp-ls2088
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* perf
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* network-basic-tests
* kselftest
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* kunit
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org