Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: core: Use octal permission

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Soham Biswas wrote:

> Sure will do that. Sorry for the inconvenience, I am a bit new to the
> process of emailing patches. Should I mark the next patch as v3?

Make sure the text you are quoting does above your reply.

This is called top-posting and is frowned upon.

Yes, please bump the version number - it will make the tooling happy.

> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 18:13, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > [added "v2" to the subject, would have been better if you had already
> > done that. I don't know if/how this confuses tools like b4 and patchwork]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 04:17:30PM +0530, Soham Biswas wrote:
> > > Fixes the following warning generated by checkpatch:
> > >
> > > drivers/pwm/core.c:1341: WARNING: Symbolic permissions 'S_IRUGO' are
> > > not preferred. Consider using octal permissions '0444'.
> > >
> > > +debugfs_create_file("pwm", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, NULL, NULL,
> > >                           &pwm_debugfs_fops);
> >
> > something like: "Permission bits are easier readable in octal than with
> > using the symbolic names." in the commit log would be good for those of
> > us who missed why this was added to checkpatch.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> >

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog