Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function.
From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Wed Nov 18 2020 - 09:56:53 EST
On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next
then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to
provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise?
I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing
topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid
merge conflicts.
I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants
to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to
be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating
the commit.
Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this patch
into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you provide me
a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your whole tree?
Regards,
Matthias
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20201030113622.201188-1-enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/