Re: [PATCH v4] mm: Optional full ASLR for mmap() and mremap()

From: Topi Miettinen
Date: Thu Nov 19 2020 - 04:16:23 EST


On 19.11.2020 0.42, Jann Horn wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:55 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:05:18PM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
Writing a new value of 3 to /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
enables full randomization of memory mappings created with mmap(NULL,
...). With 2, the base of the VMA used for such mappings is random,
but the mappings are created in predictable places within the VMA and
in sequential order. With 3, new VMAs are created to fully randomize
the mappings. Also mremap(..., MREMAP_MAYMOVE) will move the mappings
even if not necessary.

Is this worth it?

https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss2017/ndss-2017-programme/aslrcache-practical-cache-attacks-mmu/

Yeah, against local attacks (including from JavaScript), ASLR isn't
very robust; but it should still help against true remote attacks
(modulo crazyness like NetSpectre).

E.g. Mateusz Jurczyk's remote Samsung phone exploit via MMS messages
(https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2020/08/mms-exploit-part-5-defeating-aslr-getting-rce.html)
would've probably been quite a bit harder to pull off if he hadn't
been able to rely on having all those memory mappings sandwiched
together.

Compiling the system with -mcmodel=large should also help, since then even within one library, the address space layout of various segments (text, data, rodata) could be randomized individually and then finding the XOM wouldn't aid in finding the other segments. But this model isn't so well supported yet (GCC: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AArch64-Options.html, not sure about LLVM).

-Topi