Re: [PATCH] perf test: Omit test 68 for s390.

[kajoljain]

On 11/4/20 1:59 PM, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Commit ed21d6d7c48e6e ("perf tests: Add test for PE binary format support")
> adds a WINDOWS EXE file named tests/pe-file.exe, which is
> examined by the test case 'PE file support'.
> 
> This test reads the buildid from the file tests/pe-file.exe,
> which is a Portable Executable (PE) binary file used by the
> Windows operating system.
> 
> Since s390 does not support PE files, omit this test.
> 
> Output before:
> [root@t35lp46 perf]# ./perf test -F 68
> 68: PE file support                               : Failed!
> [root@t35lp46 perf]#
> 
> Output after:
> [root@t35lp46 perf]# ./perf test -F 68
> 68: PE file support                               : Skip
> [root@t35lp46 perf]#
> 
> 

Patch looks good to me. Thanks for correcting it. Since in powerpc also we are having similar issue,
I send patch on top of this change. 

Reviewed-By: Kajol Jain<kjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Kajol Jain

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> index 58b90c42eb38..4e45178c50f6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pe-file-parsing.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>  
>  #include "tests.h"
>  
> -#ifdef HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
> +#if defined(HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT) && !defined(__s390x__)
>  
>  static int run_dir(const char *d)
>  {
>