Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function.

[Matthias Brugger]

On 19/11/2020 09:32, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> > On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > > > On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next
> > > > > then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to
> > > > > provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise?
> > > >
> > > > I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing
> > > > topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid
> > > > merge conflicts.
> > >
> > > I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants
> > > to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to
> > > be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating
> > > the commit.
> >
> > Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this
> > patch into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you
> > provide me a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your
> > whole tree?
>
> Oh, I see.  I thought you wanted to develop on top of it.  Apologies.
>
> PR to follow (I'll reply directly to the patch).

No problems. Thanks a lot!

Matthias