Re: next/master bisection: baseline.dmesg.emerg on meson-gxbb-p200
From: Guillaume Tucker
Date: Thu Nov 19 2020 - 13:04:29 EST
Hi Marc,
On 19/11/2020 11:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-19 10:26, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 19/11/2020 11:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 2020-11-19 08:50, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
>>>> Please see the automated bisection report below about some kernel
>>>> errors on meson-gxbb-p200.
>>>>
>>>> Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're
>>>> trialing new bisection features on kernelci.org, however this one
>>>> looks valid.
>>>>
>>>> The bisection started with next-20201118 but the errors are still
>>>> present in next-20201119. Details for this regression:
>>>>
>>>> https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/5fb6196bfd0127fd68d8d902/
>>>>
>>>> The first error is:
>>>>
>>>> [ 14.757489] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210
>>>> [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>
>>> Looks like yet another clock ordering setup. I guess different Amlogic
>>> platforms have slightly different ordering requirements.
>>>
>>> Neil, do you have any idea of which platform requires which ordering?
>>> The variability in DT and platforms is pretty difficult to follow (and
>>> I don't think I have such board around).
>>
>> The requirements should be the same, here the init was done before calling
>> dw_hdmi_probe to be sure the clocks and internals resets were deasserted.
>> But since you boot from u-boot already enabling these, it's already active.
>>
>> The solution would be to revert and do some check in meson_dw_hdmi_init() to
>> check if already enabled and do nothing.
>
> A better fix seems to be this, which makes it explicit that there is
> a dependency between some of the registers accessed from meson_dw_hdmi_init()
> and the iahb clock.
>
> Guillaume, can you give this a go on your failing box?
I confirm it solves the problem. Please add this to your fix
patch if it's OK with you:
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For the record, it passed all the tests when applied on top of
the "bad" revision found by the bisection:
http://lava.baylibre.com:10080/scheduler/alljobs?search=v5.10-rc3-1021-gb8668a2e5ea1
and the exact same test on the "bad" revision without the fix
consistently showed the error:
http://lava.baylibre.com:10080/scheduler/job/374176
Thanks,
Guillaume
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
> index 7f8eea494147..52af8ba94311 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_dw_hdmi.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct meson_dw_hdmi {
> struct reset_control *hdmitx_ctrl;
> struct reset_control *hdmitx_phy;
> struct clk *hdmi_pclk;
> + struct clk *iahb_clk;
> struct clk *venci_clk;
> struct regulator *hdmi_supply;
> u32 irq_stat;
> @@ -1033,6 +1034,13 @@ static int meson_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> }
> clk_prepare_enable(meson_dw_hdmi->hdmi_pclk);
>
> + meson_dw_hdmi->iahb_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "iahb");
> + if (IS_ERR(meson_dw_hdmi->iahb_clk)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to get iahb clk\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(meson_dw_hdmi->iahb_clk);
> + }
> + clk_prepare_enable(meson_dw_hdmi->iahb_clk);
> +
> meson_dw_hdmi->venci_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "venci");
> if (IS_ERR(meson_dw_hdmi->venci_clk)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Unable to get venci clk\n");
> @@ -1071,6 +1079,8 @@ static int meson_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>
> encoder->possible_crtcs = BIT(0);
>
> + meson_dw_hdmi_init(meson_dw_hdmi);
> +
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("encoder initialized\n");
>
> /* Bridge / Connector */
> @@ -1095,8 +1105,6 @@ static int meson_dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> if (IS_ERR(meson_dw_hdmi->hdmi))
> return PTR_ERR(meson_dw_hdmi->hdmi);
>
> - meson_dw_hdmi_init(meson_dw_hdmi);
> -
> next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(pdev->dev.of_node);
> if (next_bridge)
> drm_bridge_attach(encoder, next_bridge,
>
>