Re: [PATCH] docs: add a reset controller chapter to the driver API docs

[Randy Dunlap]

Hi,

On 11/17/20 2:33 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Add initial reset controller API documentation. This is mostly intended
> to describe the concepts to users of the consumer API, and to tie the
> kerneldoc comments we already have into the driver API documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since the RFC [1]:
> - Replaced all :c:func:`function` with function() (Jonathan Corbet)
> - Typo fixes and wording improvements (Randy Dunlap)
> - Mention new reset_control_rearm() API as a counterpart to
>   reset_control_reset() for shared resets in the Triggering section
> - Grammar fix in the Querying section
> - Add reset.rst to MAINTAINERS
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191022164547.22632-1-p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/index.rst |   1 +
>  Documentation/driver-api/reset.rst | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                        |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 221 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/reset.rst


> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/reset.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/reset.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..00a6ad79dd6c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/reset.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@


> +Querying
> +--------
> +
> +Only some reset controllers support querying the current status of a reset
> +line, via reset_control_status().
> +This function returns a positive non-zero value if the given reset line is
> +asserted.

Maybe note that reset_control_status() does not accept a reset control array
as its input parameter.

> +
> +Reset control arrays
> +--------------------
> +
> +Some drivers need to assert a bunch of reset lines in no particular order.
> +devm_reset_control_array_get() returns an opaque reset control handle that can
> +be used to assert, deassert, or trigger all specified reset controls at once.
> +The reset control API does not guarantee the order in which the individual
> +controls therein are handled.


Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

thanks.
-- 
~Randy