Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/15] 4.4.245-rc1 review

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sat Nov 21 2020 - 13:29:08 EST


On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:02:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.245 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:45:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 165 pass: 164 fail: 1
Failed builds:
powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 328 pass: 323 fail: 5
Failed tests:
ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:initrd
ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:nvme:rootfs
ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:sdhci:mmc:rootfs
ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs
ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:sata-sii3112:rootfs

Failure in all cases is:

In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:10:0:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:11:29: error: redefinition of ‘allow_user_access’
static __always_inline void allow_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user *from,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:12:0,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:8:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h:12:20: note: previous definition of ‘allow_user_access’ was here
static inline void allow_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user *from,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:10:0:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/kup-radix.h:16:20: error: redefinition of ‘prevent_user_access’
static inline void prevent_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user *from,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:12:0,
from arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c:8:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kup.h:14:20: note: previous definition of ‘prevent_user_access’ was here
static inline void prevent_user_access(void __user *to, const void __user *from,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Guenter