Re: [PATCH 008/141] IB/hfi1: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

From: Mike Marciniszyn
Date: Sun Nov 22 2020 - 09:30:35 EST

Next message: Neeraj Upadhyay: "Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] srcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tiny SRCU grace periods"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[eventfd] 5cb13cb023: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -6.3% regression"
In reply to: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH 008/141] IB/hfi1: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Next in thread: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH 011/141] ipv4: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/20/2020 1:25 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just
letting the code fall through to the next case.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good and tested with TID rdma to cover the interlock case.

Mike

Tested-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Neeraj Upadhyay: "Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 4/6] srcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tiny SRCU grace periods"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "[eventfd] 5cb13cb023: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -6.3% regression"
In reply to: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH 008/141] IB/hfi1: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Next in thread: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH 011/141] ipv4: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]