Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

From: James Bottomley
Date: Sun Nov 22 2020 - 14:13:37 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2a/clock-sh7206.c:26:44: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "[GIT PULL] ext4 bug fixes for 5.10-rc"
In reply to: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:25 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 10:21 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Please tell me our reward for all this effort isn't a single
> > missing error print.
>
> There were quite literally dozens of logical defects found
> by the fallthrough additions. Very few were logging only.

So can you give us the best examples (or indeed all of them if someone
is keeping score)? hopefully this isn't a US election situation ...

James

Next message: kernel test robot: "arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh2a/clock-sh7206.c:26:44: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "[GIT PULL] ext4 bug fixes for 5.10-rc"
In reply to: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Next in thread: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH 000/141] Fix fall-through warnings for Clang"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]