[PATCH 4.4 35/38] mac80211: allow driver to prevent two stations w/ same address

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 3110489117581a980537b6d999a3724214ba772c upstream.

Some devices or drivers cannot deal with having the same station
address for different virtual interfaces, say as a client to two
virtual AP interfaces. Rather than requiring each driver with a
limitation like that to enforce it, add a hardware flag for it.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 include/net/mac80211.h  |    6 ++++++
 net/mac80211/debugfs.c  |    1 +
 net/mac80211/sta_info.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/mac80211.h
+++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
@@ -1915,6 +1915,11 @@ struct ieee80211_txq {
  * @IEEE80211_HW_BEACON_TX_STATUS: The device/driver provides TX status
  *	for sent beacons.
  *
+ * @IEEE80211_HW_NEEDS_UNIQUE_STA_ADDR: Hardware (or driver) requires that each
+ *	station has a unique address, i.e. each station entry can be identified
+ *	by just its MAC address; this prevents, for example, the same station
+ *	from connecting to two virtual AP interfaces at the same time.
+ *
  * @NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS: number of hardware flags, used for sizing arrays
  */
 enum ieee80211_hw_flags {
@@ -1950,6 +1955,7 @@ enum ieee80211_hw_flags {
 	IEEE80211_HW_TDLS_WIDER_BW,
 	IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_AMSDU_IN_AMPDU,
 	IEEE80211_HW_BEACON_TX_STATUS,
+	IEEE80211_HW_NEEDS_UNIQUE_STA_ADDR,
 
 	/* keep last, obviously */
 	NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs.c
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static const char *hw_flag_names[] = {
 	FLAG(TDLS_WIDER_BW),
 	FLAG(SUPPORTS_AMSDU_IN_AMPDU),
 	FLAG(BEACON_TX_STATUS),
+	FLAG(NEEDS_UNIQUE_STA_ADDR),
 #undef FLAG
 };
 
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
@@ -457,6 +457,19 @@ static int sta_info_insert_check(struct
 		    is_multicast_ether_addr(sta->sta.addr)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Strictly speaking this isn't necessary as we hold the mutex, but
+	 * the rhashtable code can't really deal with that distinction. We
+	 * do require the mutex for correctness though.
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	lockdep_assert_held(&sdata->local->sta_mtx);
+	if (ieee80211_hw_check(&sdata->local->hw, NEEDS_UNIQUE_STA_ADDR) &&
+	    ieee80211_find_sta_by_ifaddr(&sdata->local->hw, sta->addr, NULL)) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		return -ENOTUNIQ;
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -585,14 +598,15 @@ int sta_info_insert_rcu(struct sta_info
 
 	might_sleep();
 
+	mutex_lock(&local->sta_mtx);
+
 	err = sta_info_insert_check(sta);
 	if (err) {
+		mutex_unlock(&local->sta_mtx);
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&local->sta_mtx);
-
 	err = sta_info_insert_finish(sta);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_free;