[PATCH v4 01/14] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct

From: Will Deacon
Date: Tue Nov 24 2020 - 10:51:26 EST

Next message: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs"
Previous message: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support"
In reply to: Qais Yousef: "Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support"
Next in thread: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In preparation for late initialisation of the "sanitised" AArch32 register
state, move the AArch32 registers out of 'struct cpuinfo' and into their
own struct definition.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 44 +++++++++++----------
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 53 +++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
index 7faae6ff3ab4..f4e01aa0f442 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -12,26 +12,7 @@
/*
* Records attributes of an individual CPU.
*/
-struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
- struct cpu cpu;
- struct kobject kobj;
- u32 reg_ctr;
- u32 reg_cntfrq;
- u32 reg_dczid;
- u32 reg_midr;
- u32 reg_revidr;
-
- u64 reg_id_aa64dfr0;
- u64 reg_id_aa64dfr1;
- u64 reg_id_aa64isar0;
- u64 reg_id_aa64isar1;
- u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr0;
- u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr1;
- u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr2;
- u64 reg_id_aa64pfr0;
- u64 reg_id_aa64pfr1;
- u64 reg_id_aa64zfr0;
-
+struct cpuinfo_32bit {
u32 reg_id_dfr0;
u32 reg_id_dfr1;
u32 reg_id_isar0;
@@ -54,6 +35,29 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
u32 reg_mvfr0;
u32 reg_mvfr1;
u32 reg_mvfr2;
+};
+
+struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
+ struct cpu cpu;
+ struct kobject kobj;
+ u32 reg_ctr;
+ u32 reg_cntfrq;
+ u32 reg_dczid;
+ u32 reg_midr;
+ u32 reg_revidr;
+
+ u64 reg_id_aa64dfr0;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64dfr1;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64isar0;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64isar1;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr0;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr1;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64mmfr2;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64pfr0;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64pfr1;
+ u64 reg_id_aa64zfr0;
+
+ struct cpuinfo_32bit aarch32;

/* pseudo-ZCR for recording maximum ZCR_EL1 LEN value: */
u64 reg_zcr;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index dcc165b3fc04..d4a7e84b1513 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -819,6 +819,31 @@ static void __init init_cpu_hwcaps_indirect_list(void)

static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void);

+static void __init init_32bit_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info)
+{
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr1);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, info->reg_id_isar0);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1, info->reg_id_isar1);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1, info->reg_id_isar2);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1, info->reg_id_isar3);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1, info->reg_id_isar4);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, info->reg_id_isar5);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1, info->reg_id_isar6);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr0);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr1);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr2);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr3);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr4);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR5_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr5);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr0);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr1);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr2);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, info->reg_mvfr0);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, info->reg_mvfr1);
+ init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, info->reg_mvfr2);
+}
+
void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
{
/* Before we start using the tables, make sure it is sorted */
@@ -838,29 +863,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64pfr1);
init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_aa64zfr0);

- if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr0);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_dfr1);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, info->reg_id_isar0);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1, info->reg_id_isar1);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1, info->reg_id_isar2);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1, info->reg_id_isar3);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1, info->reg_id_isar4);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1, info->reg_id_isar5);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1, info->reg_id_isar6);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr0);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr1);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr2);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr3);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr4);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_MMFR5_EL1, info->reg_id_mmfr5);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr0);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr1);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1, info->reg_id_pfr2);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR0_EL1, info->reg_mvfr0);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR1_EL1, info->reg_mvfr1);
- init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_MVFR2_EL1, info->reg_mvfr2);
- }
+ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
+ init_32bit_cpu_features(&info->aarch32);

if (id_aa64pfr0_sve(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_ZCR_EL1, info->reg_zcr);
@@ -931,20 +935,12 @@ static void relax_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_id, int field)
WARN_ON(!ftrp->width);
}

-static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
- struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot)
+static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info,
+ struct cpuinfo_32bit *boot)
{
int taint = 0;
u64 pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);

- /*
- * If we don't have AArch32 at all then skip the checks entirely
- * as the register values may be UNKNOWN and we're not going to be
- * using them for anything.
- */
- if (!id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(pfr0))
- return taint;
-
/*
* If we don't have AArch32 at EL1, then relax the strictness of
* EL1-dependent register fields to avoid spurious sanity check fails.
@@ -1091,10 +1087,17 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
}

/*
+ * If we don't have AArch32 at all then skip the checks entirely
+ * as the register values may be UNKNOWN and we're not going to be
+ * using them for anything.
+ *
* This relies on a sanitised view of the AArch64 ID registers
* (e.g. SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), so we call it last.
*/
- taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, info, boot);
+ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
+ taint |= update_32bit_cpu_features(cpu, &info->aarch32,
+ &boot->aarch32);
+ }

/*
* Mismatched CPU features are a recipe for disaster. Don't even
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 77605aec25fe..8ce33742ad6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -344,6 +344,32 @@ static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
pr_info("Detected %s I-cache on CPU%d\n", icache_policy_str[l1ip], cpu);
}

+static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info)
+{
+ info->reg_id_dfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR0_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_dfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR1_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar0 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR0_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar1 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR1_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar2 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR2_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar3 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR3_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar4 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR4_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar5 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR5_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_isar6 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR6_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR0_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR1_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR2_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr3 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR3_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr4 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR4_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_mmfr5 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR5_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_pfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR0_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR1_EL1);
+ info->reg_id_pfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR2_EL1);
+
+ info->reg_mvfr0 = read_cpuid(MVFR0_EL1);
+ info->reg_mvfr1 = read_cpuid(MVFR1_EL1);
+ info->reg_mvfr2 = read_cpuid(MVFR2_EL1);
+}
+
static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
{
info->reg_cntfrq = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
@@ -371,31 +397,8 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
info->reg_id_aa64pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1);
info->reg_id_aa64zfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1);

- /* Update the 32bit ID registers only if AArch32 is implemented */
- if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
- info->reg_id_dfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR0_EL1);
- info->reg_id_dfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR1_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar0 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR0_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar1 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR1_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar2 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR2_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar3 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR3_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar4 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR4_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar5 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR5_EL1);
- info->reg_id_isar6 = read_cpuid(ID_ISAR6_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR0_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR1_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR2_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr3 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR3_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr4 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR4_EL1);
- info->reg_id_mmfr5 = read_cpuid(ID_MMFR5_EL1);
- info->reg_id_pfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR0_EL1);
- info->reg_id_pfr1 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR1_EL1);
- info->reg_id_pfr2 = read_cpuid(ID_PFR2_EL1);
-
- info->reg_mvfr0 = read_cpuid(MVFR0_EL1);
- info->reg_mvfr1 = read_cpuid(MVFR1_EL1);
- info->reg_mvfr2 = read_cpuid(MVFR2_EL1);
- }
+ if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
+ __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(&info->aarch32);

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SVE) &&
id_aa64pfr0_sve(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog

Next message: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs"
Previous message: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support"
In reply to: Qais Yousef: "Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support"
Next in thread: Will Deacon: "[PATCH v4 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]