Re: [PATCH] EDAC, mv64x60: Fix error return code in mv64x60_pci_err_probe()
From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Thu Dec 03 2020 - 06:28:22 EST
Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:30:09PM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
>> Fix to return -ENODEV error code when edac_pci_add_device() failed instaed
>> of 0 in mv64x60_pci_err_probe(), as done elsewhere in this function.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f4aeeabc061 ("drivers-edac: add marvell mv64x60 driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> index 3c68bb525d5d..456b9ca1fe8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> if (edac_pci_add_device(pci, pdata->edac_idx) > 0) {
>> edac_dbg(3, "failed edac_pci_add_device()\n");
>> + res = -ENODEV;
>> goto err;
>> }
>
> That driver depends on MV64X60 and I don't see anything in the tree
> enabling it and I can't select it AFAICT:
>
> config MV64X60
> bool
> select PPC_INDIRECT_PCI
> select CHECK_CACHE_COHERENCY
It was selected by PPC_C2K, but that was dropped in:
92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
> PPC folks, what do we do here?
>
> If not used anymore, I'd love to have one less EDAC driver.
It's dead code, so drop it.
I can send a patch if no one else wants to.
cheers