Re: [patch 3/3] tick: Annotate tick_do_timer_cpu data races
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Dec 08 2020 - 03:12:21 EST
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Also, in this particular case, why data_race() rather than READ_ONCE()?
> Do we really expect the compiler to be able to optimize this case
> significantly without READ_ONCE()?
It's about intent and how the code reads. READ_ONCE() is something
completely different from data_race(). data_race() is correct here.