Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Fix duplicate node name
From: S.j. Wang
Date: Tue Dec 08 2020 - 03:58:53 EST
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:44:51AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:21:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:53:24PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > Error log:
> > > > > > > > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> > > > > > '/bus/platform/devices/30000000.bus'
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The spba bus name is duplicate with aips bus name.
> > > > > > > > Refine spba bus name to fix this issue.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Fixes: 970406eaef3a ("arm64: dts: imx8mn: Enable
> > > > > > > > Asynchronous Sample Rate Converter")
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > > > > > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > > > > > > > index fd669c0f3fe5..30762eb4f0a7 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
> > > > > > > > @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ aips1: bus@30000000 {
> > > > > > > > #size-cells = <1>;
> > > > > > > > ranges;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - spba: bus@30000000 {
> > > > > > > > + spba: spba-bus@30000000 {
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The proper node name is "bus" so basically you introduce
> > > > > > > wrong name to other problem. Introducing wrong names at
> > > > > > > least requires a
> > > comment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just noticed that my message was barely understandable... so
> > > > > > let me
> > > fix it:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proper node name is "bus" so basically you introduce wrong
> > > > > > name to _fix_ other problem. Introducing wrong names at least
> > > requires a comment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > However the actual problem here is not in node names but in
> > > addresses:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aips1: bus@30000000 {
> > > > > > > spba: bus@30000000 {
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You have to devices with the same unit address. How do you
> > > > > > > share the address space?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think this should be rather fixed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And again, hungry keyboard ate a letter, so:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You have _two_ devices with the same unit address. How do you
> > > > > > share the address space?
> > > > > > I think this should be rather fixed.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > spba is the first block of aips1 space, so it has same start
> > > > > address as aips1.
> > > >
> > > > The reference manual describes it "Reserved for SDMA2 internal
> > > > memory", so indeed it is first address but does it have to be mapped?
> > > > Anyway, why don't you use ranges to remove the conflict?
> > >
> > > The IO address space remapping could be a solution but there is
> > > another problem - the hardware representation in DT does not match
> > > what reference manual is saying.
> > >
> > > The AIPS bus @30000000 has several IPs:
> > > - SAI2@30020000
> > > - ...
> > > - GPIO1@30200000
> > >
> > > However in DTS you will find additional SPBA bus for 30000000 -
> 300c0000.
> > > It's not really the SDMA, as SDMA is at different address. It is
> > > rather an address space which SDMA should map... but it is not a bus
> with children.
> > > Adding spba-bus@30000000 with its children does not look like
> > > correct representation of HW in DTS.
> > >
> >
> > In the RM, it says AIPS-1 (s_b_1, via SPBA) Glob. Module Enable.
> > Range is (30000000 - 300FFFFF)
>
> No, AIPS-1 is till 303F_FFFF.
Yes, AIPSA-1 is till 303F_FFFF, but it is divided to 2 parts.
(30000000 - 300FFFFF) is the first part.
Please go to table 2-3 AIPS1 memory map in RM. In the "region" column,
There is " AIPS-1 (s_b_1, via SPBA) Glob. Module Enable". It means
This part is connect to SPBA bus.
Best regards
Wang Shengjiu