Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: Add devicetree bindings documentation for Loongson SPI
From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Tue Dec 08 2020 - 09:49:21 EST
On 12/8/20 1:47 PM, zhangqing wrote:
>>> Add spi-ls7a binding documentation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-ls7a.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-ls7a.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-ls7a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-ls7a.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..56247b5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-ls7a.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>>> +Binding for LOONGSON LS7A SPI controller
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible: should be "pci0014,7a0b.0","pci0014,7a0b","pciclass088000","pciclass0880".
>>> +- reg: reference IEEE Std 1275-1994.
>>> +- #address-cells: <1>, as required by generic SPI binding.
>>> +- #size-cells: <0>, also as required by generic SPI binding.
>>> +- #interrupts: No hardware interrupt.
>>
>> You say it's a required prop, yet yuoe example doesn't have it...
> I want to emphasize here that LS7A SPI has no hardware interrupts, and DT is not actually used.
The why document the property at all?
>>> +
>>> +Child nodes as per the generic SPI binding.
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> + spi@16,0 {
>>> + compatible = "pci0014,7a0b.0",
>>> + "pci0014,7a0b",
>>> + "pciclass088000",
>>> + "pciclass0880";
>>> +
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + reg = <0xb000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
>>> + num-chipselects = <0>;
>>> + spiflash: s25fl016k@0 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>
>> Once more?
>>
>>> + compatible ="spansion,s25fl016k","jedec,spi-nor";
>>
>> Once more?
>>
>>> + spi-max-frequency=<50000000>;
>>> + reg=<0>;
>>
>> Once more? Did you mean this for a child node?
> Yes, these are child node attributes, the child node splash is not necessary.
You should indent the child nodes with 1 more tab...
>>
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>
> Thanks
>
> -Qing
MBR, Sergei