Re: [PATCH 15/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: use UCC_GETH_{RX, TX}_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT macros directly

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 05/12/2020 à 20:17, Rasmus Villemoes a écrit :
> These macros both have the value 32, there's no point first
> initializing align to a lower value.
>
> If anything, one could throw in a
> BUILD_BUG_ON(UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT < 4), but it's not worth it
> - lots of code depends on named constants having sensible values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c | 8 ++------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
> index 273342233bba..ccde42f547b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
> @@ -2196,9 +2196,7 @@ static int ucc_geth_alloc_tx(struct ucc_geth_private *ugeth)
>   		    UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_SIZE_MEMORY_ALIGNMENT)
>   			length += UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_SIZE_MEMORY_ALIGNMENT;
>   		if (uf_info->bd_mem_part == MEM_PART_SYSTEM) {
> -			u32 align = 4;
> -			if (UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT > 4)
> -				align = UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT;
> +			u32 align = UCC_GETH_TX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT;

I think checkpatch.pl will expect an empty line here in addition.

>   			ugeth->tx_bd_ring_offset[j] =
>   				(u32) kmalloc((u32) (length + align), GFP_KERNEL);
>   
> @@ -2274,9 +2272,7 @@ static int ucc_geth_alloc_rx(struct ucc_geth_private *ugeth)
>   	for (j = 0; j < ug_info->numQueuesRx; j++) {
>   		length = ug_info->bdRingLenRx[j] * sizeof(struct qe_bd);
>   		if (uf_info->bd_mem_part == MEM_PART_SYSTEM) {
> -			u32 align = 4;
> -			if (UCC_GETH_RX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT > 4)
> -				align = UCC_GETH_RX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT;
> +			u32 align = UCC_GETH_RX_BD_RING_ALIGNMENT;

Same

>   			ugeth->rx_bd_ring_offset[j] =
>   				(u32) kmalloc((u32) (length + align), GFP_KERNEL);
>   			if (ugeth->rx_bd_ring_offset[j] != 0)