Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/highmem: Lift memcpy_[to|from]_page to core

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:38:14AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:23:16PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:57:03PM -0800, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Placing these functions in 'highmem.h' is suboptimal especially with the
> > > changes being proposed in the functionality of kmap.  From a caller
> > > perspective including/using 'highmem.h' implies that the functions
> > > defined in that header are only required when highmem is in use which is
> > > increasingly not the case with modern processors.  Some headers like
> > > mm.h or string.h seem ok but don't really portray the functionality
> > > well.  'pagemap.h', on the other hand, makes sense and is already
> > > included in many of the places we want to convert.
> > 
> > pagemap.h is for the page cache.  It's not for "random page
> > functionality".  Yes, I know it's badly named.  No, I don't want to
> > rename it.  These helpers should go in highmem.h along with zero_user().
> 
> I could have sworn you suggested pagemap.h.  But I can't find the evidence on
> lore.  :-/   hehehe...
> 
> In the end the code does not care.  I have a distaste for highmem.h because it
> is no longer for 'high memory'.  And I think a number of driver writers who are
> targeting 64bit platforms just don't care any more.  So as we head toward
> memory not being mapped by the kernel for other reasons I think highmem needs
> to be 'rebranded' if not renamed.

Rename highmem.h to kmap.h?