On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 11:33:38AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:Good to know:-)
On 12/8/20 9:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:Yeah, provided the robots don't hate on it more than already reported.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:14:11PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:I have checked the four patches in your locking/core branch. They look good
Waiman Long (5):So I've munged the lot onto the other rwsem patches and skipped #4, I've
locking/rwsem: Pass the current atomic count to
rwsem_down_read_slowpath()
locking/rwsem: Prevent potential lock starvation
locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic lock stealing
locking/rwsem: Wake up all waiting readers if RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED
locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning
not even boot tested them (will go do so shortly).
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git locking/core
to me. Are you planning to push the branch to tip soon so that it can be
ready for the next merge window?