Re: [patch 0/8] ntp/rtc: Fixes and cleanups
From: Alexandre Belloni
Date: Tue Dec 08 2020 - 23:02:41 EST
On 09/12/2020 01:33:08+0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> On Sun, Dec 06 2020 at 22:46, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Miroslav ran into a situation where the periodic RTC synchronization almost
> > never was able to hit the time window for the update. That happens due the
> > usage of delayed_work and the properties of the timer wheel.
> >
> > While that particular problem is halfways simple to fix this started to
> > unearth other problems with that code particularly with rtc_set_npt_time()
> > but expanded into other things as well.
> >
> > 1) The update offset for rtc-cmos is off by a full second
> >
> > 2) The readout of MC146818 (rtc-cmos and arch code) is broken and can
> > return garbage.
> >
> > 2) Alexandre questioned the approach in general and wants to get rid of
> > it. Of course there are better methods to do that and it can be
> > completely done in user space.
> >
> > Unfortunately it's not that simple as this would be a user visible
> > change, so making it at least halfways correct.
> >
> > 3) Alexandre requested to move that code into the NTP code as this is not
> > really RTC functionality and just usage of the RTC API.
> >
> > 4) The update offset itself was questioned, but the time between the
> > write and the next seconds increment in the RTC is fundamentaly a
> > hardware property. The transport time, which is pretty irrelevant for
> > direct accessible RTCs (rtc-cmos), but relevant for RTC behind i2c/SPI
> > needs to be added on top.
> >
> > It's undebated that this transport time cannot be correctly estimated,
> > but right now it's 500ms which is far off. The correct transport time
> > can be calibrated, a halfways correct value supplied via DT, but
> > that's an orthogonal problem.
> >
> > The following series addresses the above:
> >
> > 1) Fix the readout function of MC146818
> > 2) Fix the rtc-cmos offset
> > 3) Reduce the default transport time
> >
> > 4) Switch the NTP periodic sync code to a hrtimer/work combo
> >
> > 5) Move rtc_set_npt_time() to the ntp code
> > 6) Make the update offset more intuitive
> > 7) Simplify the whole machinery
>
> any opinion on this?
>
This looks very good to me, however, I think the 10ms offset is a bit
too much. Do you mind waiting one or two days so I can get my test setup
back up?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com