Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: Clean up some lines from ufshcd_hba_exit()

[Stanley Chu]

Hi Can,

On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 22:58 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
> ufshcd_hba_exit() is always called after ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling() and
> ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so no need to suspend clock scaling again in
> ufshcd_hba_exit().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 12266bd..0a5b197 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -7765,6 +7765,7 @@ static void ufshcd_async_scan(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
>  		ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling(hba);
> +		ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(hba);

How about moving above two lines to ufshcd_hba_exit()?

Otherwise looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanleyc.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  		ufshcd_hba_exit(hba);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -8203,10 +8204,6 @@ static void ufshcd_hba_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	if (hba->is_powered) {
>  		ufshcd_variant_hba_exit(hba);
>  		ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false);
> -		ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
> -		if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> -			if (hba->devfreq)
> -				ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
>  		ufshcd_setup_clocks(hba, false);
>  		ufshcd_setup_hba_vreg(hba, false);
>  		hba->is_powered = false;