Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Wed Dec 09 2020 - 05:33:37 EST

Next message: Vladimir Oltean: "Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sja1105: simplify the return sja1105_cls_flower_stats()"
Previous message: Oscar Salvador: "Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm,memory_hotplug: Allocate memmap from the added memory range"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat"
Next in thread: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: "Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2020-12-09 11:25:34 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Sebastian fixed this via...

We still look if we go that road or update lockdep.

Sebastian

Next message: Vladimir Oltean: "Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sja1105: simplify the return sja1105_cls_flower_stats()"
Previous message: Oscar Salvador: "Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm,memory_hotplug: Allocate memmap from the added memory range"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat"
Next in thread: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: "Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]