[PATCH 0/6] Fix lockdep vs local_lock_t

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Dec 10 2020 - 09:51:08 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH 5/6] locking/lockdep: Exclude local_lock_t from IRQ inversions"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH] cxl: Reduce scope for the variable “mm” in cxllib_get_PE_attributes()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH 5/6] locking/lockdep: Exclude local_lock_t from IRQ inversions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

After a few days of confusion, here are patches that (hopefully!) teach lockdep
about local_lock_t.

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH 5/6] locking/lockdep: Exclude local_lock_t from IRQ inversions"
Previous message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "Re: [PATCH] cxl: Reduce scope for the variable “mm” in cxllib_get_PE_attributes()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[PATCH 5/6] locking/lockdep: Exclude local_lock_t from IRQ inversions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]