Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: implement KVM_{GET|SET}_TSC_STATE
From: Marcelo Tosatti
Date: Thu Dec 10 2020 - 19:30:20 EST
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:48:10PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 12:26, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:58:23PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Marcelo,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 13:34, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:33:15PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Dec 08 2020 at 15:11, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> >> > max_cycles overflow. Sent a message to Maxim describing it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Truly helpful. Why the hell did you not talk to me when you ran into
> >> >> that the first time?
> >> >
> >> > Because
> >> >
> >> > 1) Users wanted CLOCK_BOOTTIME to stop counting while the VM
> >> > is paused (so we wanted to stop guest clock when VM is paused anyway).
> >>
> >> How is that supposed to work w/o the guest kernels help if you have to
> >> keep clock realtime up to date?
> >
> > Upon VM resume, we notify NTP daemon in the guest to sync realtime
> > clock.
>
> Brilliant. What happens if there is no NTP daemon? What happens if the
> NTP daemon is not part of the virt orchestration magic and cannot be
> notified, then it will notice the time jump after the next update
> interval.
>
> What about correctness?
>
> ALL CLOCK_* stop and resume when the VM is resumed at the point where
> they stopped.
>
> So up to the point where NTP catches up and corrects clock realtime and
> TAI other processes can observe that time jumped in the outside world,
> e.g. via a network packet or whatever, but there is no reason why time
> should have jumped outside vs. the local one.
>
> You really all live in a seperate universe creating your own rules how
> things which other people work hard on to get it correct can be screwed
> over.
1. T = read timestamp.
2. migrate (VM stops for a certain period).
3. use timestamp T.
> Of course this all is nowhere documented in detail. At least a quick
> search with about 10 different keyword combinations revealed absolutely
> nothing.
>
> This features first, correctness later frenzy is insane and it better
> stops now before you pile even more crap on the existing steaming pile
> of insanities.
Sure.