Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
From: Thierry Reding
Date: Fri Dec 11 2020 - 03:36:06 EST
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:39:26PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Like I said, that's not what I was saying. I was merely saying that if
> > there aren't any use-cases that current users rely on that would be
> > broken by using this simpler implementation, then I'm okay with it, even
> > if it's less flexible than a more complicated implementation. It should
> > be possible to determine what the current users are by inspecting device
> > trees present in the kernel. Anything outside the kernel isn't something
> > we need to consider, as usual.
>
> If "users in mainline" is the criteria that's a word.
I didn't say "users in mainline", I said "use-cases". What I don't want
to happen is for this change under discussion to break any existing use-
cases of any existing users in the kernel. I said that we can determine
what the existing users are by looking at which device trees use the
compatible strings that the driver matches on.
> So you agree we remove the following drivers?:
>
> - pwm-hibvt.c
> Last driver specific change in Feb 2019, no mainline user
> - pwm-sprd.c
> Last driver specific change in Aug 2019, no mainline user
No, that's an extrapolation of what I was saying above. Drivers with no
apparent users are a separate topic, so don't conflate it with the issue
at hand.
While it's certainly unfortunate that these don't seem to be used, I see
no reason why we should remove them. They don't create much of a
maintenance burden, so I'm fine with keeping them in the hopes that
users may still show up at some point.
> Most PWMs are added to cpu.dtsi files with status = "disabled", I wonder
> if it makes sense to check the machine.dts files if some of the PMWs are
> completely unused. Do you consider status = "okay" a use that we have to
> retain even if the node has no phandle?
A PWM controller may be in use via sysfs even if it has no phandle.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature