[tip: core/rcu] rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment

[tip-bot2 for Zhouyi Zhou]

The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     354c3f0e22dcb17c10d0b79f6e1c5ba286eec0b0
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/354c3f0e22dcb17c10d0b79f6e1c5ba286eec0b0
Author:        Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:53:03 
Committer:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:37:17 -08:00

rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment

This commit fixes a typo in the rcu_blocking_is_gp() function's header
comment.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3438534..0f278d6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3572,7 +3572,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
  * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
  * implies a grace period.  Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION.
  *
- * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
+ * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any
  * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
  * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
  * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited().  It is OK to