Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the risc-v tree

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Mon Dec 14 2020 - 19:56:33 EST


On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:37:47 PST (-0800), andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:21:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

lib/Makefile

between commit:

527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")

from the risc-v tree and commits:

8250e121c672 ("lib/list_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
17bf776cf09a ("lib/linear_ranges_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
23fa4e39ee62 ("lib/bits_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests")
1987f84faec6 ("lib/cmdline_kunit: add a new test suite for cmdline API")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Looks good enough (*) to me, thanks!

*) I think we might group that new line with an existing one(s) of the same
level (GENERIC_LIB) but it doesn't really matter.

I went back and forth on that one: it's got the same Kconfig name, but it's not
a libgcc function. Maybe we shouldn't have had the "_LIB" in there? I don't
remember if that was meant to stand for libgcc or lib/...

I'm happy to just re-spin my patch to avoid the conflict. It's near/at the top
of my tree, so it's not a big deal, but I'm also just OK merging second and
pointing out the conflict. Unless you care one way or the other I'll just do
whatever ends up being easier for me :)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc lib/Makefile
index bcedd691ef63,dc623561ef9d..000000000000
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@@ -350,8 -350,7 +350,9 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw

# KUnit tests
obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += bits_kunit.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += linear_ranges_kunit.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list_kunit.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o