Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: avoid indirect calls in dst functions

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Mon Dec 14 2020 - 22:29:05 EST

Next message: pr-tracker-bot: "Re: [GIT pull] x86/apic for v5.11-rc1"
Previous message: liwei (GF): "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: No need to check CPU 0 in {loongson3,bmips,octeon}_cpu_disable()"
In reply to: Brian Vazquez: "[PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: use indirect call helpers for dst_mtu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 23:33:36 +0000 Brian Vazquez wrote:
> From: brianvv <brianvv@xxxxxxxxxx>

We'd prefer you to use your normal name rather than just "brianvv".

> Use of the indirect call wrappers in some dst related functions for the
> ipv6/ipv4 case. This is a small improvent for CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y

Any numbers you can provide?

Next message: pr-tracker-bot: "Re: [GIT pull] x86/apic for v5.11-rc1"
Previous message: liwei (GF): "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: No need to check CPU 0 in {loongson3,bmips,octeon}_cpu_disable()"
In reply to: Brian Vazquez: "[PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: use indirect call helpers for dst_mtu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]