RE: New objtool warning..

From: David Laight
Date: Wed Dec 16 2020 - 05:48:11 EST


From: Josh Poimboeuf
> Sent: 16 December 2020 04:49
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:22:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I only see this on my laptop, but that's probably because my desktop
> > is built using clang. So it's a gcc code generation interaction, I
> > suspect..
> >
> > Anyway, the new warning is
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.o: warning: objtool: do_cvt_mode() falls
> > through to next function drm_mode_detailed.isra.0()
> >
> > and googling around a bit I see that 0day ended up reporting it on the
> > linux-next lists, and blames commit 991fcb77f490 ("drm/edid: Fix
> > uninitialized variable in drm_cvt_modes()").
> >
> > That presumably then makes gcc generate that odd code.
> >
> > That "unreachable()" is because the compiler isn't smart enough to see
> > that yes, there really are case statements for every single possible
> > case. Oh well. Maybe the code should just make one of the possible
> > cases also be the "default:" case, and that might fix it.
> >
> > But maybe this is worth looking into for objtool too?
> >
> > Anyway, I see it with gcc-10.2.1 as per current F32. Holler if you
> > can't reproduce it, I can send the object file around.
>
> I can't recreate with my compiler, but I think I've seen one like this
> before. I suspect s/unreachable()/BUG()/ would fix it?

Then a smart(er) compiler will report that the BUG() is unreachable.

David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)