Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: rt4831: Adds support for Richtek RT4831 MFD core

From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Dec 16 2020 - 09:59:30 EST

Next message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mmap: Don't unlock VMAs in remap_file_pages()"
Previous message: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH] vfs, syncfs: Do not ignore return code from ->sync_fs()"
In reply to: ChiYuan Huang: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: rt4831: Adds support for Richtek RT4831 MFD core"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, ChiYuan Huang wrote:

> Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年12月16日週三下午10:12寫道：
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, cy_huang wrote:
> >
> > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This adds support Richtek RT4831 MFD core. It includes four channel WLED driver
> >
> > Drop mentions of MFD. Just core driver will do.
> >
> > > and Display Bias Voltage outputs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > since v2
> > > - Refine Kconfig descriptions.
> > > - Add copyright.
> > > - Refine error logs in probe.
> > > - Refine comment lines in remove and shutdown.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 10 ++++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/mfd/rt4831-core.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rt4831-core.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > > index 8b99a13..dfb2640 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1088,6 +1088,16 @@ config MFD_RDC321X
> > > southbridge which provides access to GPIOs and Watchdog using the
> > > southbridge PCI device configuration space.
> > >
> > > +config MFD_RT4831
> > > + tristate "Richtek RT4831 four channel WLED and Display Bias Voltage"
> > > + depends on I2C
> > > + select MFD_CORE
> > > + select REGMAP_I2C
> > > + help
> > > + This enables support for the Richtek RT4831 that includes 4 channel
> > > + WLED driving and Display Bias Voltage. It's commonly used to provide
> > > + power to the LCD display and LCD backlight.
> > > +
> > > config MFD_RT5033
> > > tristate "Richtek RT5033 Power Management IC"
> > > depends on I2C
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > > index 1780019..4108141 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > > @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MENF21BMC) += menf21bmc.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_HI6421_PMIC) += hi6421-pmic-core.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_HI655X_PMIC) += hi655x-pmic.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DLN2) += dln2.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RT4831) += rt4831-core.o
> >
> > Why is this called -core ...
> >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_RT5033) += rt5033.o
> >
> > ... and this isn't?
> >
>
> Ok, I'm rename the mfd file to rt4831 only.
> Due to this mfd is the parent of all sub device, to use 'core' is
> trying to distinguish from rt4831-regulator or rt4831-backlight.
> My original thought is not to let the user confused.
> If to add the postfix '-core' in the file name is bad, I think it can
> be removed.
>
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SKY81452) += sky81452.o
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rt4831-core.c b/drivers/mfd/rt4831-core.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..f837c06
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/rt4831-core.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2020 Richtek Technology Corp.
> > > + *
> > > + * Author: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define RT4831_REG_REVISION 0x01
> > > +#define RT4831_REG_ENABLE 0x08
> > > +#define RT4831_REG_I2CPROT 0x15
> > > +
> > > +#define RICHTEK_VID 0x03
> > > +#define RT4831_VID_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> > > +#define RT4831_RESET_MASK BIT(7)
> > > +#define RT4831_I2CSAFETMR_MASK BIT(0)
> > > +
> > > +static const struct mfd_cell rt4831_subdevs[] = {
> > > + OF_MFD_CELL("rt4831-backlight", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "richtek,rt4831-backlight"),
> > > + MFD_CELL_NAME("rt4831-regulator")
> > > +};
> >
> > Just a little note about these helpers. I'm planning on unifying the
> > names pretty soon. So if you have to rebase, please watch out for the
> > rename.
> >
> > Essentially OF_MFD_CELL() will soon become MFD_CELL_OF().
> >
> Yes, I'll check this change. BTW, is it possible to get this patch
> that I can integrate it into my codebase in advance.

Once it's applied, it will be in Linux -next.

Until then, don't worry about it.

> > > +static int rt4831_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +{
> > > + struct gpio_desc *enable;
> >
> > My preference would be "enable_gpio" to ensure it's easily
> > identifiable further on.
> >
> Yes, it make sense.
> > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > + unsigned int val;
> >
> > 'val' is not a great name for a variable that is used for a specific
> > purpose. How about 'revision'?
> >
> Actually, this is just for the vendor id check.
> Maybe to named 'vendor_id' is more suitable.
> This register can be divided into two parts, bit[7:4] is the fixed
> vendor identifier, only bit[3:0] is for the chip revision.
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + enable = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(enable)) {
> > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get 'enable' GPIO\n");
> > > + return PTR_ERR(enable);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &rt4831_regmap_config);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to initialize regmap\n");
> > > + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, RT4831_REG_REVISION, &val);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get H/W revision\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if ((val & RT4831_VID_MASK) != RICHTEK_VID) {
> >
> > What does VID stand for here?
> >
> > The fact that I have to ask probably means it should be changed.
> >
> > Variant ID perhaps? If so, call the define 'VARIANT_ID'.
> >
> Like as the the above explaination.
> 'RICHTEK_VID' may not be good. So it make you confused.
> I'll rename it to 'RICHTEK_VENDOR_ID'. How about this naming?
>
> > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "VID not matched, val = 0x%02x\n", val);
> >
> > Using variable names means nothing to the user.
> >
> > "revision: 0x%02x" ?
> >
> How about this one "CHIP ID: 0x%02x"?
> May I use 'chip_id to replace this variable 'val' naming?
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Used to prevent the abnormal shutdown.
> > > + * If SCL/SDA both keep low for one second to reset HW.
> > > + */
> > > + ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, RT4831_REG_I2CPROT, RT4831_I2CSAFETMR_MASK,
> > > + RT4831_I2CSAFETMR_MASK);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to enable I2C safety timer\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return devm_mfd_add_devices(&client->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, rt4831_subdevs,
> > > + ARRAY_SIZE(rt4831_subdevs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int rt4831_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +{
> > > + struct regmap *regmap = dev_get_regmap(&client->dev, NULL);
> > > +
> > > + /* Disable WLED and DSV outputs */
> > > + return regmap_update_bits(regmap, RT4831_REG_ENABLE, RT4831_RESET_MASK, RT4831_RESET_MASK);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void rt4831_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +{
> > > + struct regmap *regmap = dev_get_regmap(&client->dev, NULL);
> > > +
> > > + /* Disable WLED and DSV outputs */
> > > + regmap_update_bits(regmap, RT4831_REG_ENABLE, RT4831_RESET_MASK, RT4831_RESET_MASK);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused rt4831_of_match[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "richtek,rt4831", },
> > > + {}
> > > +};
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rt4831_of_match);
> > > +
> > > +static struct i2c_driver rt4831_driver = {
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "rt4831",
> > > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(rt4831_of_match),
> >
> > The trend is to not use of_match_ptr() anymore, as these devices can
> > not be instantiated using ACPI.
> >
> OK, I'll remove 'of_match_ptr'.
> > > + },
> > > + .probe_new = rt4831_probe,
> > > + .remove = rt4831_remove,
> > > + .shutdown = rt4831_shutdown,
> > > +};
> > > +module_i2c_driver(rt4831_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Yes, all fine. Thanks.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Next message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mmap: Don't unlock VMAs in remap_file_pages()"
Previous message: Jeff Layton: "Re: [PATCH] vfs, syncfs: Do not ignore return code from ->sync_fs()"
In reply to: ChiYuan Huang: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mfd: rt4831: Adds support for Richtek RT4831 MFD core"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]