Re: [Patch v3 0/2] cgroup: KVM: New Encryption IDs cgroup controller

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 03:44:35PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Concern with a single misc controller would be that any subsystem that 
> wants to use it has to exactly fit this support: current, max, stat, 
> nothing more.  The moment a controller needs some additional support, and 
> its controller is already implemented in previous kernel versionv as a 
> part of "misc," we face a problem.

Yeah, that's a valid concern, but given the history, there doesn't seem to
be much need beyond that for these use cases and the limited need seems
inherent to the way the resources are defined and consumed. So yeah, it can
either way.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun