Re: [PATCH v9 05/11] mm/hugetlb: Allocate the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page
From: Mike Kravetz
Date: Wed Dec 16 2020 - 20:19:11 EST
On 12/13/20 7:45 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> When we free a HugeTLB page to the buddy allocator, we should allocate the
> vmemmap pages associated with it. We can do that in the __free_hugepage()
> before freeing it to buddy.
...
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 78c527617e8d..ffcf092c92ed 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/bootmem_info.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
> #include <asm/dma.h>
> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
> @@ -39,7 +40,8 @@
> *
> * @rmap_pte: called for each non-empty PTE (lowest-level) entry.
> * @reuse: the page which is reused for the tail vmemmap pages.
> - * @vmemmap_pages: the list head of the vmemmap pages that can be freed.
> + * @vmemmap_pages: the list head of the vmemmap pages that can be freed
> + * or is mapped from.
> */
> struct vmemmap_rmap_walk {
> void (*rmap_pte)(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -54,6 +56,9 @@ struct vmemmap_rmap_walk {
> */
> #define VMEMMAP_TAIL_PAGE_REUSE -1
>
> +/* The gfp mask of allocating vmemmap page */
> +#define GFP_VMEMMAP_PAGE (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN)
> +
> static void vmemmap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long end, struct vmemmap_rmap_walk *walk)
> {
> @@ -200,6 +205,68 @@ void vmemmap_remap_reuse(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
> free_vmemmap_page_list(&vmemmap_pages);
> }
>
> +static void vmemmap_remap_restore_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> + struct vmemmap_rmap_walk *walk)
> +{
> + pgprot_t pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL;
> + struct page *page;
> + void *to;
> +
> + BUG_ON(pte_page(*pte) != walk->reuse);
> +
> + page = list_first_entry(walk->vmemmap_pages, struct page, lru);
> + list_del(&page->lru);
> + to = page_to_virt(page);
> + copy_page(to, page_to_virt(walk->reuse));
> +
> + set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(page, pgprot));
> +}
> +
> +static void alloc_vmemmap_page_list(struct list_head *list,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + while (nr_pages--) {
> + struct page *page;
> +
> +retry:
> + page = alloc_page(GFP_VMEMMAP_PAGE);
Should we try (or require) the vmemmap page be on the same node as the
pages they describe? I imagine performance would be impacted if a
struct page and the page it describes are on different numa nodes.
> + if (unlikely(!page)) {
> + msleep(100);
> + /*
> + * We should retry infinitely, because we cannot
> + * handle allocation failures. Once we allocate
> + * vmemmap pages successfully, then we can free
> + * a HugeTLB page.
> + */
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + list_add_tail(&page->lru, list);
> + }
> +}
> +
--
Mike Kravetz