Re: [PATCH v2, 3/3] mailbox: cmdq: add mt8192 support

[Chun-Kuang Hu]

Hi, Yongqiang:

Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年12月24日 週四 上午8:55寫道：
>
> add mt8192 support
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index 75378e3..7f243e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v2},
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v3},
>         {.compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v4},
> +       {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce", .data = (void *)&gce_plat_v4},

In the view of hardware function, is mt8192-gce identical to
mt6779-gce? If these two are identical, you need not to modify driver,
and the compatible should be

compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-gce", "mediatek,mt6779-gce";

If they are not identical, what's the different?

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>         {}
>  };
>
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek