Re: [PATCH -tip V2 00/10] workqueue: break affinity initiatively

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:08:51PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:52 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > Can you please specify a bit what you encountered in rcutorture
> > > before this patchset? You know we cant have a correct estimation
> > > of the fix diameter without your help.
> 
> >
> > It triggers the following in sched_cpu_dying() in kernel/sched/core.c,
> > exactly the same as for Lai Jiangshan:
> >
> >         BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1 || rq_has_pinned_tasks(rq))
> >
> > Which is in fact the "this" in my earlier "rcutorture hits this".  ;-)
> >
> >                                                         Thanx, Paul
> >
> 
> Hi, Hillf
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/22/141
> 
> >From the email, I think rcutorture encountered the same problem.
> 
> Hi, Paul
> 
> I'm sorry to forget to add your Tested-by.

No need to apologize, especially given that I didn't get around to
testing it until after it was pulled into -tip.  ;-)

Thank you for the patch series!

							Thanx, Paul