Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: readahead: apply a default readahead size

[Toralf Förster]

On 12/29/20 11:55 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > No, this is wrong.  'size' in this case is the size of the read.
> > And it's zero.  Is this fixed by commit
> > 3644e2d2dda78e21edd8f5415b6d7ab03f5f54f3
> Toralf, can you test with 5.11-rc1 (or later)?
>
> thanks.

My plan was to apply that commit on top of the upcoming 5.10.4 and test
that, just waiting in moment for Greg to release the stable version.

--
Toralf